Payday loansPayday Loans

Recent News

  • Myanmar Politician Preparing to Seek Legal Limits on Interfaith, Interethnic Marriage

  • Call for Religious Leaders to Teach Acceptance in Malaysia

  • Attacks on religion, liberty

  • Can Muslim lands learn to tolerate Christianity?

  • China vents anger over Dalai Lama's planned Norway visit

  • Militia attack Muslims in Central African Republic's capital

  • Egypt’s new charter stronger on personal freedoms

  • Pussy Riot members freed from prison

  • Frank Wolf, champion of religious freedom, will end congressional career

  • A Political Deal in a Deeply Divided Tunisia as Islamists Agree to Yield Power

  • Egyptian Christians Bridle at Prison Terms for Copts Only in Fatal Clash

  • The Central African Republic descending into ‘complete chaos’

  • French burqa ban challenged in top European court

  • Sharia in Sudan v. women and religious freedom

  • China aims to harness religious beliefs to promote harmony

  • Afghanistan Considers Reinstating Public Stoning for Adultery

  • Sunnis Close Baghdad Mosques to Challenge Religious Attacks

  • Modi campaign stirs religious divide in India's heartland

  • Aung San Suu Kyi, and Myanmar, faces an uncertain future

  • Syrian Christians flee persecution as Patriarch urges them to stay in war-torn country

  • Central African Republic on the verge of genocide, France warns UN

  • Myanmar rejects U.N. resolution on Rohingya Muslims

  • How the State Department Is Getting Religion

  • UN to Myanmar: Make Rohingya Muslims citizens

  • Our Failed Religious Freedom Policy

  • Turkey drops a screen over Christianity

  • Opinion: The oppression of Bahais continues in Iran

  • TAJIKISTAN: "The Law demands that all religious literature be checked by the State"

  • Sudan’s Enduring Question: The Role of Shari'ah in the Constitution and Law

  • The Role of the Hijab Is Becoming a National Problem for Russia

  • For Indian Christian leader, Narendra Modi is a threat to religious freedom

  • Commentary: The two faces of India

  • With 'loving kindness', Myanmar frees 69 political prisoners

  • New U.N. Rights Council Members Are Elected

  • Turkish court lifts headscarf ban for attorneys

  • Egypt's Christians close ranks as kidnappings spike

  • Hundreds of Buddhists in Myanmar protest Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s upcoming visit

  • Frank Wolf Renews Calls for Release of U.S. Pastor from Iranian Prison

  • Many Sunnis and Shias Worry About Religious Conflict

  • China paper blames blind faith of “uncultured” Uighur youth for Xinjiang unrest

  • Turkey's Alevis protest for greater freedoms

  • KAZAKHSTAN: "He was told not to sell religious literature"

  • Myanmar violence between Buddhists, Muslims threatens reforms

  • UZBEKISTAN: Baptist camp ordered seized, Protestant pressured to inform

  • Tibetans Call China’s Policies at Tourist Spot Tacit but Stifling

  • Violence against Muslims threatening Myanmar reforms: U.N. envoy

  • Putin says unnamed foreign foes use radical Islam to weaken Russia

  • Malaysia’s curbs on use of the term ‘Allah’ hurting its moderate Muslim image

  • Vietnamese Court Orders Two Parishioners of Vinh Diocese Jailed

  • Opinion:State Department stays mute on persecuted religious minorities worldwide

  • Turkey, Religious Freedom and the Current State of Christian-Muslim Dialogue (1895)

  • In Nigeria, Wedlock Seen as Terror Fix

  • Northern Iraq no longer safe for Christians

  • Clerics call on UN military force to secure Central African Republic

  • EU condemns Egypt church violence, urges end to religion-based attacks

  • Young Turkish Jews emigrating due to anti-Semitism, tensions with Israel

  • Egypt orders trial of four policemen over killing of Islamist detainees

  • Passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

  • Egyptian writer may face jail for accusations of defaming religion

  • UN expert hails “key breakthrough for religious freedom reached in Cyprus”

  • Kenneth Bae's mother tells of heartbreak after seeing, leaving imprisoned son

  • Conviction of Christians for Murder of Hindu Leader in India Biased, Unfounded, Attorneys Say

  • Opera Fights Hungary’s Rising Anti-Semitism

  • Buddhists and Christians denounce Hanoi for using law to control religions

  • ARMENIA: "Imprisoned conscientious objectors should be immediately and unconditionally released"

  • Bombs planted in confessional box of Syrian church

  • French court upholds Scientology fraud conviction

  • Suzan Johnson Cook to resign as religious freedom ambassador

  • BELARUS: Why is Catholic priest still detained by KGB secret police?

  • Q&A: What Court Decision on Use of ‘Allah’ Means for Malaysia

  • The Surprising Story Of 'Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an'

  • Religious tension runs deep for Vietnam’s minorities

  • Malala Yousafzai wins EU's Sakharov human rights prize

  • Religious liberty takes center stage in diplomacy with Iran

  • Turban row: Sikh NGO wins case against France at UN

  • Vietnam Lets Churches Thrive, but Keeps Control

  • KAZAKHSTAN: Pastor to be transferred from prison to house arrest

  • Kenya Salvation Army Church Torched; Four Killed

  • Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng gets U.S. platform to promote human rights

  • Orthodox leader calls for end Christians' persecution

  • Jewish groups slam Council of Europe Assembly resolution on circumcision

  • Opinion: Quebec’s coup d’etat against religious freedom

  • Small town, big impact: Supreme Court case could define religion’s role in public

  • European council passes anti-ritual circumcision resolution

  • Council of Muftis complain to U.S. reps about disrespect for Muslims in Russia

  • Woman, 94, killed as Buddhist rioters attack Muslim villages in western Myanmar

  • RUSSIA: What's wrong with "extremist" Koran translation?

  • Persecution against Christians increases in many parts of the world

  • How Promotion of Religious Freedom Can Help Prevent Extreme Violence

  • RUSSIA: Muslims rush to challenge Koran "extremism" ruling

  • Judge Ordered Sikh to Remove 'That Rag' from Head, Says ACLU

  • Donate by Paypal or Credit Card

    Solution Graphics

    Click Amazon to Help ICRF

    amzn-ba100x70.gif (2357 bytes)

    Help ICRF with your donation

    Follow ICRF on Twitter

    Twitter Image

    Like Us on Facebook

    Facebook Image
    Religious Education as a Human Right PDF Print E-mail

    Don Feder
    The Boston Herald

    delivered at the
    International Coalition for Religious Freedom Conference on 
    "Religious Freedom and the New Millenium"
    Washington DC, April 17-19, 1998

    In his recent trip to Cuba, the pope voiced his strong support for parental choice in education. In the struggle for religious freedom in America, school choice is the most significant as well as the most neglected aspect of the debate.

    In the city of Santa Clara, to thunderous applause, John Paul II declared that while the state has a legitimate role to play in education, “this does not give public authority the right to take the place of parents.’’

    Families “should be able to choose for their children the pedagogical method, the ethical and civic content and the religious inspiration which will enable them to receive an integral education,’’ the pontiff told those assembled for an outdoor mass.

    Catholic education, which once thrived in Cuba, is today nonexistent. Fidel Castro (who saw the church as a threat to his authority) closed the nation’s parochial schools in the early 1960s.

    Unlike Cuba, the United States is a mostly free and basically democratic society. And yet, the liberal elite that controls America’s public schools is as adverse to educational choice, as the party elite that rules Cuba is. When we think of the way secular, liberals stifle religious expression in education, we usually focus on school prayer, Christmas carols, and the like. But educational choice (vouchers, tuition tax credits) is itself a religious freedom issue. In America, religious liberty is based on the self-evident principle that parents have a right to impart spiritual values to their children. No one would deny that a mother and father have a right to take their children to church or synagogue services, to celebrate religious holidays, to perform rituals, and to read the Bible together in their homes. But the amount of time the average family devotes to church attendance, religious instruction, and home devotion is minimal compared to the 7 hours a day, 35 hours a week that the public schools have their children as a captive audience.

    It has been a very long time (measured in decades) since public-school pedagogy concerned itself primarily with instruction in academic subjects. Now, much of the school day is taken up by indoctrination in the creed of modern liberalism (otherwise known as secular humanism), including—but by no means limited to—sex education, values clarification, multiculturalism, race education, ecology studies, gay sensitivity sessions, and other forms of political correctness. Students are programmed in a dogma (a worldview) directly at odds with our Judeo-Christian heritage. One reason prayer was taken out of public education in the early 1960s was to avoid a troubling contradiction—children praying to the one God at the beginning of the school day and taught to worship other gods for the rest of the day. The academic failings of public education are too well documented to require elaboration here. But their moral failings—their propagation of pernicious doctrines that are contrary to both reason and virtue—are even more appalling.

    In a recent article, New York Post columnist Ray Kerrison wrote of a 78-minute documentary film, produced by two lesbians and titled “It’s Elementary Talking About Gay Issues in School.” This Orwellian video is being shown in public schools nationwide. Kerrison says: “First- and second-graders—children so young they clearly don’t even know what sexuality is—are given the full treatment about homosexuals, lesbians and bisexuals. Prodded by a homosexual teacher, children eagerly approve of homosexual marriage. Those who do not embrace the homosexual agenda are depicted as cruel homophobes, bigots and haters.”

    Kerrison quotes Dr. Howard Hurwitz, a retired public school principal that viewed the film. Hurwitz comments: “Never in my 50 years of experience in the schools have I seen so scandalous a plan for indoctrinating children. It is an assault on common decency and traditional family values.’’

    School choice (really, parental choice)—in the form of vouchers, tax-funded scholarships, or tuition tax credits—would give families the means to resist this onslaught, an option other than surrendering their children for socialization. That’s why liberals resist the concept so fiercely.

    On March 4, the House Judiciary Committee approved the Religious Liberty Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The amendment essentially provides equal treatment for religious and secular groups and ideas in the public sector. Rep. John Conyers Jr. of Michigan, the committee’s ranking Democrat, denounced the amendment as “extremely dangerous.’’ Conyers’ reasoning is revealing. “The real import of the measure,” the congressman declared, “is to force the government to fund religious organizations in the same way it funds secular activities with an ultimate goal of supporting school vouchers and de-funding the public education system.’’

    Last September, Education Secretary Richard Riley, in expressing his contempt for vouchers, made several observations that were inane and intellectually dishonest even by the standards of the Clinton cabinet. “Vouchers would begin the unraveling of this uniquely American fabric—the common public school that has been open to one and all and gives everyone a fair chance to succeed,’’ the secretary charged. “Moreover,” Riley remarked, “religious schools now make up 79 percent of private schools.” As if that alone were enough to damn them, “Thus,” the secretary cautioned, “vouchers would lead to public support of religious education on a massive scale.”

    Liberals know exactly where the greatest challenge to their authority lies. Say “religious freedom or equality’’ and, like Pavlov’s dogs, they immediately bark “vouchers.’’ Say “tuition tax credits” or “educational scholarships’’ and they frantically reply “parochial schools.’’ Of course, they see nothing wrong with forcing religious families to support the public education system through their property taxes or other levies. Liberals aren’t at all adverse to making these families pay twice, if they choose to send their children to a religious school. What with the high cost of housing, food, clothing, and other necessities, many families are unable to bear this double burden. That is exactly the way liberals want it. Like Castro, they don’t want competition for the minds and hearts of the young. Hence their single-minded dedication to creating obstacles to private—particularly religious—education.

    If parents have the option of a parochial, Christian, or Jewish day school, many will choose to give their children an education that reflects their spiritual values, instead of surrendering them to the state educational system or indoctrination in the liberal fads of the day.

    Lee Berg of the National Education Association’s Center for the Revitalization of Urban Education, is excruciatingly candid: “When education is not public we no longer have the ability to control what is taught.’’ And that ladies and gentlemen is what it’s all about—control, domination, compulsion, coercion. Liberals believe that they, and they alone, should be able to shape the future, that only their views should be presented in America’s classrooms.

    The NEA has a position on every political issue, from abortion to racial quotas. On each, it marches in lockstep with liberal dogma. It supports candidates for public office committed to these causes. And, its members control America’s public schools. If you think the NEA’s political agenda doesn’t seep into daily instruction there, think again.

    By the way, the educators who write the textbooks, design curriculum, and choose course materials, have the same political passion.

    Given judicial misinterpretation of the First Amendment, there are many religious liberty issues to be resolved. Public school children should be able to say a nondenominational prayer or engage in a moment of silent meditation at the beginning of the school day. Municipalities should be able to display crèches and menorahs during the holiday season. Judges should be able to display the Ten Commandments (the foundation of our system of justice) in their courtrooms. Charitable organizations should not be denied public funding due solely to religious affiliation. All of this is necessary, in keeping with our national heritage and basic fairness. But giving parents the ability to choose a religious education for their children is more important to the future of religious liberty in America than all of the foregoing.

    Educational choice is a religious right, and denial of the same is the most serious violation of freedom of conscience in America today.