Payday loanshow to write a good thesis
creative college admissions essay questions
equivalent fraction homework help
cover letter for associate director of admissions
homework help for grade 710 math students
ramapo essay help
does your homework help you learn
how can you trust online custom writing service
homework help in earth science
latex style file for phd thesis
create a thesis statement for me
essay on famous writers
business law homework help
dissertation abstracts online nedir
phd comics what is the thesis
georgetown university application essay officers
literature review on creative writing
customer service project management resume
resume paper help
dissertation using secondary data
which essay writing service is reliable
essay about university
help field experience writing paper online
pay for college application essay
writing an argument essay
dissertation on online shopping
health and social care coursework help
categorizing in dissertation
literature review service uk
reading homework helper kids
usf resume help
kinds of sociology
phd thesis size
boat salesman resume
master thesis grounded theory
buy an english essay
astronomy homework help
dissertation defense wikipedia
conclusion of essay
dissertation reports in advertising
good objective statement for resume sales
essay using spatial order
customer service rep resume description
essays on honesty
federal resume writer kathryn troutman
communication career services resume
private essay writing service
online dissertation help singapore
how to write a good essay to get a scholarship
ielts essay checking service
manager administrative services cover letter
phd personal statement
dissertation anova table
essays for universities
cell sales resume
homework help algebra 1 word problems
dissertation usa hotel industry
resume and chronological order
where to get homework answers
phd thesis manuscript
the help kathryn stockett essays about life
custom writing essays custom written essays
resume internal sales position
essay writing service discount code
write my own brief report of cabin fever
pay for dissertation reference
physics of skateboarding essay
essay about helping someone in need
diagraming sentences homework help
admission paper for sale bangladesh
research paper stock prices
dissertation undergraduate
write an essay about water pollution using cause and effect order
custom essay and dissertation writing services it canada
math homework helpers tv show
essay on night by elie wiesel
resume writing service scams
additional coursework on resume edexcel
online speech writing help
private peaceful essay help
dissertation subjects graphic design
quest homework help physics
research papers for sale mla
master thesis on strategic management
outside salesperson resume
help with conclusion of essay
research paper american dreams
simple customer service resume
chemistry homework help conversions
admission college essay help kaplan
phd dissertation on advertisement in tamil
customizing thesis theme wordpress
do bibliography book report
50 cent i do my homework
safety thesis papers masters program
essay on volunteer service
senior management sales resume
buying term paper illegal
online script writing
write my history essay for me
dissertation services uk dom
animal farm research paper
dissertation plagiarism
sales and service engineer resume
radio sales resume cover letter
cheap written essays
essay about my lover
physics homework help websites
title generator for essay
24 7 can contact custom high quality support thesis
admission essay writing english
write formal business report
comment rediger une dissertation
finance resume service
customer care resume
best computer science dissertations
homework spelling help
saxon homework help
i need help starting my essay
assignment management accounting answer
essay on my life
business essay get into school that will
attorney resume writing service reviews
race and ethnicity essay
community service essay guidelines
help with media essay
master thesis petroleum engineering
good professional resume writing service
writing personal essay for college admission letter
can someone do my assignment
10 science homework help
jacob d haskell phd thesis
phd research proposal on climate change adaptation
paperclip resume and cover letter together
business development sales manager resume
custom power point
buy custom essay uk
essay on cognitive theory jean piaget
how to write a simple essay about myself
phd thesis on derivatives
phd thesis on alice walker
narrative essay structure
homework help for english
definition case study dissertation
order bound dissertation
essay about past life
doctorate degree dissertation only
educational philosophy essay
salesrecruitment cover letter
acid rain papers
dissertation help in hyderabad
professional resume writers in nj
help for statistics homework
online homework helper to chat
career development dissertation teaching theory
buy custom research paper online
best resume writing services in nyc executive
dissertation abstracts int
average dissertation length
a good community service essay
buy presentation
helping the elderly essay
thesis for narrative essay
dissertation icerocket tag
do my uni assignment uk
write my school paper
critical thinking application papers unit 1
dissertation on class size reduction
essay on bus service
help with electrical engineering homework
essay on home
best college admission essay kwasi enin
help with history coursework
tess of the d39urbervilles essay help
application essay writing what is an introduction
writing custom paper solution on financial accounting
essay on doing community services
report writing for dummies
admission essay writing key points
the help essay on racism
service station attendant resume
how to write a good attention getter for essays
dissertation acknowledgements family
order resume online cake
military resume writers san diego ca
cell phone argument essay
for my masters thesis
essays on time
Payday Loans
Psychology, Religion, and the Law PDF Print E-mail

Jeremiah Gutman
Attorney

delivered at the
International Coalition for Religious Freedom Conference on 
"Religious Freedom and the New Millenium"
Tokyo, Japan May 23-25, 1998

Instead of reading the paper I had prepared, I am going to address some of the issues, especially in light of so many insightful and informative remarks that have been made both earlier and in this session.

First, I suppose I should say who I am religiously, since it is only fair that everybody know where everyone is coming from. My parents were atheists, and they brought me up to be an atheist. I have never changed my mind on that. I have represented and continue to represent religious people. I applaud the definition that we heard earlier from Professor Malony, because in American law, religion has been very broadly defined in an area in which I have had a good deal of experience. That has to do with military conscientious objection. U.S. law provides when there is a military draft, a person cannot be compelled to serve if that person has a religious objection to participation in war.

Originally, the religious objection exception was granted only to Mennonites, Quakers, and a few other groups whose official policy was pacifist. It was denied to persons who didn’t belong to those particular religions. I find offensive and contrary to American constitutional law the very concept of a religion having to be recognized. Therefore, the courts were faced with objections to participation in war by men—there was and still is no female draft in our country—who said they didn’t belong to any religion but refused because it offended their conscience, their sense of right and wrong. And the draft boards said nonsense. You are not a Quaker, you are not a Mennonite, you just said you weren’t religious. The exception goes only to religious people.

That went up to the Supreme Court, which held that such an objector only thinks that he is not religious. If you object on the grounds of morality and offensiveness to your conscience, whether you like it or not you are religious and are entitled to the exemption to military service. So we have had for 25 or 30 years the concept that religion is not what many people in the lay sense think it is. It is a much broader concept.

As a matter of fact, what it has done is to separate the concept of morality from the concept of what most people think of as religion and religiosity. You can be a moral person and perform only those things which you think are good and not belong to any organized religion. The Court has affirmed that concept in these conscientious objection cases.

Now Dr. Coleman talked a good deal about the interaction between psychiatry and law and between those two and religion. I want to take off a little bit on that. A doctor of psychiatry in Massachusetts some years ago certified a client of mine as having joined the Hare Krishna group because his will had been captured and he had no free will. Therefore, he said, my client ought to be in a psychiatric hospital. So he was put in a psychiatric hospital and was examined by the staff, who hadn’t been properly prepared. They said there is nothing wrong with this guy.

When the report came back to the judge, he said to the certifying psychiatrist, “Well, they have had him there now for the period of time provided by the statute and they find there is nothing wrong with him.” This psychiatrist took that as support for his view. I quote from his testimony:

The absence of symptoms merely demonstrates the depth of pathology. The fact that there is nothing wrong with him proves that there must be something terribly wrong with him, otherwise you would be able to see there was something wrong with him.

It is hard to beat logic like that. We would all be in the booby hatch based on that kind of thinking. The judge didn’t buy it, and the man was freed. He went back and rejoined his religion.

In another case in which I participated, the psychiatrist said this young woman is terribly unhappy with the choice she has made in joining the Unification Church. The young woman said no she wasn’t. She was happy with her religion, and she felt comfortable and satisfied. The doctor said she only thinks she is happy. You can’t win. There is another lawyer who used the law to support his theory justifying kidnapping (called deprogramming) and unlawful imprisonment, including assaults. Some victims were actually beaten up, and they certainly had to be assaulted to take them away in the first place.

His argument went as follows: The United States, in its wisdom, during the Civil War in the 1860s, passed what is called the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which provides that human slavery is no longer permitted in our country. (It took a long time, but we finally got around to saying that human slavery was not a good idea and was against the law.) This famous professor, who is practicing in California, came up with the theory that the Unification Church in particular, but other churches and religious organizations as well, violates the Thirteenth Amendment because it enslaves the minds of the people whose minds they have washed. Since their will has been overcome, they are slaves; therefore, by capturing and freeing them we are enforcing the Thirteenth Amendment.

The law, as well as psychiatry, can be perverted. It is perverted by people who want to preserve things as they are. One of the things I think we should address is the concept in the American and other constitutions of separation between religion and government. Many states have official religions. Britain has an official religion. The queen is the chief minister of that religion. Israel has an official religion, Judaism. Thailand has an official religion. Many, many states have official religions. The problem with an official religion is that every resident of that state is compelled against her will by payment of taxes to support a religion that she may not believe in.

That I find offensive. The very concept that the state and the religion are one and that the state can enforce or support a religion by placing a burden upon everyone, whether or not they belong to the religion, is dangerous. The United States, despite the First Amendment calling for separation of church and state, gives tax exemptions. Some states support religion more directly, the way it is done in Italy where you indicate on your income tax return which religion you want your money to go to. But you can’t say you don’t want it to go to any religion.

If the state is supporting a religion, then it can dictate to the ministers of that religion what they must preach. Otherwise, the source of funds can be cut off. Similarly, if the religion depends on public funding, it is going to kowtow to the politics of the moment. And then they become prostitutes of opportunism.

The United States glories in having been founded by people seeking religious freedom. Our children are taught to venerate the Pilgrims who fled England to be able to worship as they chose. But when the Pilgrims got to the colonies, they established their own religion. So they became the persecutors. That is a tradition in American history; we have persecuted all new religions. In our historical shortsightedness, we think in terms of how the Hare Krishnas and the Unificationists and the Children of God (now called the Family) are being persecuted, as though this is something new. But it is not new.

The Pilgrims persecuted those who refused to worship in their churches, in their way. A famous Protestant minister named Roger Williams fled Massachusetts because his way of looking at Christ was different than the official way. He went a few miles down the coast and established Rhode Island, which is now another state in the United States. There he established his own group as the persecutors. When the tablets of God were found by the Mormons in the United States, they were persecuted. When the Catholics arrived from Italy and Ireland in the 19th century, the Protestant majority in the United States persecuted them.

The common denominator is that the people in power in any place at any time tend to view the arrival of a new set of ideas as dangerous to the status quo, as dangerous to the ability of those exercising power to maintain their grip on power. Therefore, the new, the novel, becomes the object of discrimination and persecution. This isn’t a new concept, and it is certainly not limited to the United States.

People can believe in concepts in a way that is perhaps religious. One of the arguments against a particular religion may be a look at what they believe: It is inconsistent with logic and rationality. But that is what many religions are about. Many religions glory in that aspect of their tenets. That is, you believe on faith. You don’t have to believe because it can be demonstrated scientifically. The scientific demonstration of the divinity of Christ is yet to be established. Yet there are hundreds of millions of people in the world who believe it, not because it can be proven but because they choose to believe it. They have been socialized to believe it. If I choose not to believe it, that should be my freedom. If they choose to believe it, that should be their freedom.

Not that they tolerate me or that I tolerate them. But I recognize their independent integrity, their humanity, their dignity, and the right of each individual to believe that which he believes to be so.

Other concepts of beliefs are persecuted in the same way. In the United States we like to think of ourselves as being able and willing, even anxious, to look at all sides of an issue. That is baloney. We teach our children to believe that the capitalist system is the best economic system and that the way we do things, by elections rather than fiat or monarchy, is the best way to organize a political system. When people come along with such a concept as communism or socialism and challenge the concepts of democracy and capitalism, the democrats and capitalists get very excited. When the Protestants came along at the time of the Reformation and challenged the infallibility of the pope, the people who were making a good living and feeling very secure by depending on the papacy got very excited.

The argument is never “I am going to protect my interest” or “we are going to perpetuate ourselves in power.” The argument always becomes, “You are Satan, you are possessed, you are deceived. We have the truth.” I say beware of anyone or any religion or any government, whether supported by its religion or otherwise, which says there is only one truth and you better believe it because we get it directly from the source, whatever you choose to call it. There is only one truth and we have it. That is a terribly dangerous thing. It leads to suppression, tyranny, and dehumanization of the individual.