Payday loansPayday Loans
Nevertheless is not the case payday loans Why not

Recent News

  • Religion and Public Life in America

  • A Distressing Map of Religious Freedom Around the World

  • Commentary: An assault on freedom of religion

  • China Jailed Uyghur Pastor Denied Visit

  • Turkey: Lawyers can wear headscarves, court rules

  • China’s latest restriction for Tibetans: no passports

  • New Burning; Monks Jailed

  • Islamic cleric sentenced to death for Bangladesh war crimes

  • Pakistani official: Society flourishes with religious freedom

  • Call to burn Bibles heightens Malaysian election tensions

  • Why Germans distrust Islam

  • Stanford Inaugurates Nation’s First Legal Clinic for Religious Freedom

  • Egyptian court sentences Christian family to 15 years for converting from Islam

  • AZERBAIJAN: No legal place of worship for 40,000-strong town

  • Tibet: Fifteen Held Over Burnings

  • Polish court rejects call to remove crucifix from parliament

  • Saudi clerics protest against appointing women to advisory body

  • Indonesia: Religious freedom under attack as Shi'a villagers face eviction

  • Mixed religious-freedom rulings at European Court of Human Rights

  • Halki Seminary Gets 470 Acres From Turkey

  • China:Fiery Start to New Year

  • Azerbaijani Protesters Fined Under New Mass-Gatherings Law

  • We don't want our burqas back: women in Afghanistan on the Taliban's return

  • Report: 100 Million Christians Persecuted Worldwide, North Korea Worst Offender

  • KYRGYZSTAN: NSC secret police behind "needed" new religious freedom punishments

  • Sudan Cracks Down on South Sudanese Christians

  • Over 600 illegal Rohingya migrants held in Thai raids

  • Rights group warns Pakistan faces worsening sectarian violence

  • Preacher alarms many Egyptians with calls for Islamist vice police

  • Maldives cleric's murder raises fears of growing religious extremism

  • Malaysian Police Raid Sect, Seize Weapons: Report

  • Yes to interfaith harmony, no to religious police in Egypt

  • Hungary: Prosecutors reject complaint against lawmaker who said some Jews are security risk

  • Opinion: Stand with Hobby Lobby for religious liberty

  • KYRGYZSTAN: NSC secret police behind "needed" new religious freedom punishments

  • Restaurant bill sparks deadly religious riot in India

  • Anti-Semitism and Germany's Movement Against Circumcision

  • Egypt’s Christians worried by Islamists’ rise

  • Bahais cannot enroll in public schools, education minister says

  • Cuba Sees Dramatic Rise in Religious Freedom Violations

  • Dalai Lama Seeks Probe

  • Parents sue school after girl, nine, is banned from wearing hijab

  • Donate by Paypal or Credit Card

    Solution Graphics

    Click Amazon to Help ICRF

    amzn-ba100x70.gif (2357 bytes)

    Help ICRF with your donation

    Fan Us on Facebook

    Facebook Image

    Follow Us on Twitter

    Twitter Image
    EU Agency for Fundamental Rights: A Reality Check PDF Print E-mail

    The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), the Vienna-based organization charged with ensuring the protection of “fundamental rights of people living in the EU,” faces a critical assessment of its performance in this just issued 72-page report.

    The study was released by Human Rights Without Frontiers, a non-profit human rights organization based out of Brussels, Belgium. Following is a summary by the author, Dr. Nadja Milanova, and a link to the full document.


    EU AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (FRA):
    A REALITY CHECK

    Human Rights Without Frontiers Int'l

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    The purpose of the present report is to provide a critical assessment of the work of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and to identify some shortfalls in the overall EU system of promotion and protection of EU fundamental rights and values. The work on the report has been guided by the premise that the new fundamental rights dimension of the EU policies, ensuing from the legally binding nature of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as incorporated in the Lisbon Treaty, makes it necessary for the European Union to develop and consolidate a genuine culture of fundamental rights at the level of both EU institutions and EU Member States broadly and when applying and implementing the Union Law.

    The importance of a EU fundamental rights culture has been widely acknowledged but it is still in its nascent stages and risks to remain rudimentary, unless a proper institutional architecture is installed to support its development and consolidation. Notwithstanding the existing mechanisms and legal provisions in place, the whole system remains fragmented and reactive.


    In its resolution of 15 December 2010, the European Parliament calls on the EU institutions and Member States to increase coherence among their various bodies responsible for monitoring and implementation of fundamental rights protection and to reinforce a cross-EU monitoring mechanism, as well as an early warning system, similar to the UN Universal Periodic Review. However, the European Union still lacks a comprehensive internal human rights structure to ensure cross-institutional coordination and to allow each institution to build upon other institutions' reports and institutional expertise acquired in the process of their autonomous processes of conducting compatibility checks and impact assessments of legislative proposals and policies.

    On its side, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), which has been in existence since 2007 as a "focused observation and assessment agency on Union policies", falls short of filling the gap of a much-needed early warning mechanism and ex ante examination of breaches or risk of breaches of EU fundamental rights. Most importantly, FRA fails short of fulfilling two important criteria underlying the UN Paris Principles governing the work of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs), i.e. a broad mandate and full-fledged independence.

    Despite these deficiencies, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights still can carve an important role for itself in the overall EU fundamental rights architecture, if properly resourced, mandated and politically supported. In this respect, the objective of this report is to raise critical questions at a period when the Agency is coming to the end of its first five-year Multiannual Framework (MAF) and starts planning for its second five-year cycle of existence. This should be seen as a critical juncture of the institutional learning process of the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights. It is therefore an opportune time to assess the Agency's position and role within the EU fundamental rights architecture as well as its added value and ability to mobilise resources and expertise to fulfil its mandate within the context of the prescribed broad-based participatory process of consultations within the EU and its Member States.

    Report drafted by Nadja Milanova

    Brussels, 7 November 2011

    Full Report availabe at: http://www.hrwf.net/Joom/images/reports/2011/fra%20a%20reality%20check.pdf