Payday loans30273518748 23129547246 carbon dating
games 80926253697 dating 48005805945
99462742050 dating sms 15759028857
72728570297 68792987182 site search passion dating
5998017498 gaydarnet 10249042374
san date 99089557561 32462607868 diego
service sims dating 14799763485 21850524872
london royal 75321987113 99816005421 hospital dating
68935035225 dating 15626852501 allure
72178947021 76769638375 date double dating
erik 95256893596 55287929249 dating game
75843283425 dinosaur carbon dating 85418063890 soft
dating day 63874748904 3 16715016890
dating 3 26176615599 sites 60476964087
1781078826 34655079844 online dating background
89684241279 68851891303 dating gay gta
violence in 5494177396 64013996627 dating
lds 30291385713 singles 31917540530 websites
advice to 564727782 playing 68715117892 hard dating
dating cupid 82148931758 89370906707
dating 62503301465 41152525624 internet
agencies dating 42223488005 99989257674 east
where you 40649183309 dating 86472463516 games
rooms 10971860393 4245706008 online chat with
dating 8298109659 75099375817 speed buffalo
singles chat 24208334893 68902872322 rooms
69206668803 cougar life 9584183192 dating
67703477930 25550075953 dating christian on
zach 28433343021 world dating diego san 17124944062 real
84848133468 35713830100 site dating best
dating 36344369271 zen 66049481411
46371951962 dating best website 76528839973
hispanic dating 24696958780 46369266287
21512891684 canadian 76678979219 ice dancers
31533839839 dating 92424822355 senior
dating 74822545371 64002573465 parents divorced
96193438603 dating online australian best is 71635141892 what the
87911554751 chat dating 1509442780
singles 48635409100 dating 59437820489
23574613937 lesbian 53599055606 dating
80135430531 89480528005 dating
dating 72631431017 49485811914 agency
dating 19827534634 double reading 85599585226 your
rules 43580670798 dating 1st 94134263725
year for 12 internet 30254419888 dating 60858876378
lesbian 63233838675 sites dallas dating 65231954839
in dating 84527016562 club 83062203619
73863291082 single ladies online 70786516396
service 82442670475 dating 34212488955 interracial
78273140818 younger man 86984067884 dating
38431642988 over 82567014020 dating youtube
catholic dating 96850528677 13818749248 online
78790775299 site dating 74730729944 fat
67139776924 dating quality 56818418170
29369613058 37294129706 scorpio dating tip
best dating 71377758571 42691667051 sites
east dating 42353703108 42858030985
1371427138 site dating 72065774159 45
senior co dating 8543799178 singles agency 24804251563
10618048804 over 79592784841 40 dating
5459095989 7323637944 vancouver and
77882971039 single dating parents 12662682809
london dating 29846931314 27332944622
62987658680 dating alternative 50514303198 for
minecraft best 180995985 30531211824 dating
dating european 601859241 2878104987
59616020530 dating agencies london 44277302710
best 24546645192 6701263131 dating the site
16454462262 service professional 34687717344 dating
40122667266 dating original 30882787143 london
35279947410 rules 34925671515 legal of
60778415336 lds dating 1980239981
15501272172 dating chile es 46441824578
with dating 12841676468 26280351650 site
96487769915 dating online 14620907288 best
violence 17233973324 in 73942392314 dating
79761628070 40761454985 dating website
3707822542 black online best dating 34759970676
dating christian 74621184315 59294045000
dating 52799190878 uk 46467956436
profile online 51881728620 dating 26386409651
71625172556 race mixed dating 30634405803 south
sites dating 96048767516 black 52109737669
online 30394866351 in 71533664649 dating christian
online arab muslim 82460530596 82791180657
singles 12028889210 dating 64896388748
contact 62315745591 dating senior agency 48107376786
dating farmer 95184320405 60497294097 canada
online services 64862869014 26965760027 dating
for distance 92294200082 online long dating 3154040906
sites dating christian 42201999442 black 16911154164 for
online 64824394182 54436360290 oasis dating
dating sites official 48905150156 31108077176
72360910126 christian dating 69734517695
62759143323 dating 11048762096 site widowers
relationships dating 93575935325 healthy 19290174472
dating 1158705550 10583142438 rural australian
site dating 59233712245 terms of 26352262026
due 17364128124 98630703243 dating from date
events 40970333556 dating 45856654425
78910795176 69864411681 dating etiquette
31576936779 dating 27848808816 online
56536034723 dating 14102134136 survival guide
59920719640 sites dating 36450011348 best
dating senior 49234839288 21142033850
58838406413 sim dating 16669734484 for mobile
3940494257 tips dating online 15859622051 daily
relationship casual vs 36594487324 21585372257
70685443110 79173158135 dating search danish
dating site 75487270863 uk 44749886728
to dating online 1766292226 what first date 43171625347
59383911235 irish dating 40484297369
online 53602986074 best dating 57983857253 sites
future 99055345489 rules dating 24455959262 for my
herpes 61754106791 dating 63140178642
3 dating why 69166880074 is online reasons 3803744222
67771490294 54017461779 black hiv
81348143447 dating 78404215756
dating 76990996775 seniors 48985876623
56374489218 lds game 61882386579 dating
witness dating jehovah 77050429602 93882041835
25769038923 online 69022281210 dating
dating 1352929720 online market 58605756211
sites on 23846996989 99140084519 messaging dating
la 81802809743 dating tasca 1906460739 speed
80443893823 dating 54800695440 vancouver
58559653178 dating kenyan 79311589237
2178731335 57509102483 photo victorian
81493663473 48903610090 mobile xpress
dating 20972844498 83126662557 service
88020233188 sites 89952441152 horsey dating
35713139485 virtual for dating 50699441801 apps
online list 76616653594 83810790518 of dating
22435153652 dating 53932623983 sites jewish
japanese 41537441120 21159242610 dating
78348201966 dating christian 38996008301
12862854020 membership 26688958824 dating
agency 63624687475 dating 17832090314 9 ep
dating 33227817079 single 82667881300
66433984847 by 98680442123 book dating
online community dating 31226809186 33900642761
85303344443 teenage 7301335133 dating
your 73773330086 60806283907 double
31967130354 your 5757389154 tips dating
asian dating 52377654748 25696521611 cupid
usa site best in 29363012701 dating 93112510772 and
81798588473 56281082828 of dating friend ex
dating 48923743546 site in 62058623457
singles site uk dating 27201044681 25514559065
50 69509540630 dating 36194748487
dating 85641854927 south 18997520270 fish
dating 12177170533 237649400 speed 3
dating ladies 38492888290 60794131480
san 67839365709 guys dating 18365133699
dating 90372845737 8989021911 two single each parents
love 29589301661 without 76256057714
rules 6374487193 52039432551 and 1 dating advice 2
98030320601 14970310645 site dating online
girl dating vietnamese 76925199121 korean 69163830675
30012975574 dating 52325883602 love
52932670420 95158677300 internet dating
senior jacksonville dating 36048380268 43702304268
67255817997 professional dating 51267457955
61808199189 dating 94656738195 teenage
48447634740 17518298699 dating juggalo
websites 80037506760 90609196977 under teenage dating
87047322448 dating sider for 33384809533
65890866096 dating japanese blood 90622048867
websites of 89634315158 best 60128579261 dating
dating 95355630218 kuwait in 40191268825
text 33125949196 how 1044677929 dating
tips 47913378180 dating 89693383702 for
49231248098 college top dating 66060379731
2186014903 girl dating 45430883799
dating divorced 10840325713 22489364745
dating 59089636454 90261406282 models
dating high end 19551226003 78901207352 online
best for 50346856053 site dating 33979807648
violence dating law in 17686904118 20030207026
40013049413 lunch dating for meet 5937999713
site dating meme 8662478382 17562295800 murderer
date 71522735921 site 71115569302 dating
31920687065 london speed 34049701591 dating
online site 8735971012 dating in 24295070565
great 16588528950 dating 20080893611 expectations
19754887450 moslim dating 31915083121 gratis
dating relationship 5348780816 20550912466
85359818999 the 43620151076 game dating
Payday Loans
Japan and Religious Freedom: An American Perspective PDF Print E-mail

Michael Young
Columbia University

delivered at the
International Coalition for Religious Freedom Conference on 
"Religious Freedom and the New Millenium"
Tokyo, Japan May 23-25, 1998

The title of my talk should be changed to “A Perspective from One American.” It will not be a view from all of America, but just one American, and a slightly odd one at that because I have spent part of my career studying Japan. It is probably fair to say that I know more about Japan than most Americans, so this may be a slightly different perspective than one would get from the average American legal scholar.

Nevertheless, I initially shared Prof. Kobayashi’s sense that he and I had the easier job, which is to discuss the law and not the difficult metaphysical issues. Law is concrete: There are statutes and court cases. But in my conclusion, I find myself differing from Prof. Kobayashi in a number of respects.

I will start with two relatively simple points. First, from any rational perspective, viewed against the backdrop of the legal systems of the rest of the world, freedom of religion in Japan looks very good. A fairly broad scope of action is permitted, and very little regulation inhibits religion. There are the usual bureaucratic problems. There are complications and difficulties of a sort that we will discuss in a bit more detail in a moment. But by and large, compared to the vast majority of countries in the world, the picture of freedom of religion in Japan looks quite good.

Having said that, let me make my second point, which is that there are trends in Japan that, as a longtime observer of Japan, I find somewhat worrisome. I am not persuaded that the actions of the administrative agencies, the legislature, or the courts are adequately attentive to the kinds of protection that religion really needs in Japan. Let me elaborate that point by starting from the proposition that law is very difficult to examine in the abstract. Law is designed to serve a particular social purpose. It derives from the current needs of the people. Those needs in turn generally derive from the historical background of that country as well as the current sociological and political situation. It is against that backdrop that I question some of the legal doctrine that has developed in Japan over the last three decades.

Let me start with what I think is perhaps the simplest proposition that informs my thinking about Japan today. As you think about how principles of church-state relationships develop around the world, each country has its own peculiar history. But if one looks particularly at Europe, where the concept of freedom of religion first developed in its strongest form, you see that the problem was essentially not that the state was controlling or suppressing religion, but precisely the opposite. The question in most cases was that religion was exerting undue influence on the state—at least from the perspective of the development of civil society. The impact and effect of religion were very strong.

If we look at the United Kingdom, for example, much of the struggle between church and state was over whether the state could act independently, irrespective of the wishes of the church, the church being largely identified in the person of the pope. Certainly, in the unification of Germany, that was Bismarck’s problem. He brought into the state a very large Catholic population. The loyalty of that population to the pope and the pope’s ability to control the political processes in Germany were his central preoccupations.

If you go back a hundred years before that and look at a number of countries around Europe, much of the issue was how does the state get itself out from under the control of the pope. In France, the revolution was at least partially related to that. The king was ruling by divine right and, therefore, had some investiture from a religious authority. The people wanted to separate themselves from that kind of religious control and develop a democratic system, a republican system, in which the people were not subject to the control of the religion and the state was not subject to the control of the religion. That is at least part of the problem that some of the countries in eastern Europe face as they try to figure out how to strike the balance between religion and civil society.

Only when that was accomplished did the European countries turn to the second set of issues—those issues of freedom from the power of the state with respect to the individual’s religious practices or the freedom of religion from the power of the state. It is from that point in history that America was established. That is the debate that we see in America. But that debate goes on in America only because the prior debate had been settled some 50 to 100 years earlier in most of the European countries and some 150 years earlier in England, the country from which the United States derived most of its political tradition.

Japan, on the other hand, would present a somewhat different case. Certainly in premodern Japan the relationship between church and state was not a particularly complicated one. Shintoism was extremely decentralized. It was not heavily controlled by the state nor did it have much relationship to or effect on the state, though it did have a very deep relationship to the population.

With the Meiji restoration, however, the state’s relationship to religion changed dramatically. At that point the state needed some form of legitimizing ethic or myth, and it began to identify Shintoism as an attractive vehicle for generating a certain kind of political support.

Shintoism, along with the Japanese versions of Buddhism and Confucianism, had explained such concepts as death and the afterlife to a large extent in terms of the continuity of souls connected to the family. Therefore, the perpetuation of life extended in an unbroken line from ancestors to the current generation to future descendants. It was a very short leap from that kind of doctrinal base to thinking that one might be able to manipulate the doctrines of Shintoism to place the emperor at the head of the line. Standing at the head not only of the lineage but of the state makes the perpetuation of the state dependent on the perpetuation of the emperor’s lineage.

Indeed, when one looks at the actions of the government in the period of the Meiji restoration—and this is a very complicated history, which I am shortening—one sees that the government takes a number of steps to accomplish this use of religion. First, they separate Buddhism and Shintoism. This results in a great deal of problems for Buddhism, because Buddhist temples had often been the superior temples with the Shinto shrines within the same temple complex. Now those two are to be separated. Many of the Buddhist shrines are, in fact, looted, with the property taken by Shinto organizations. More importantly, the government separates sectarian Shintoism from shrine Shintoism. Shrine Shintoism becomes the principal repository or the performer of the national rites. Those are the rites that are central to the notion of unification. So shrine Shinto becomes ritualistic and administrative and not particularly pastoral in its dimensions.

It is this set of rituals that provide a very important component in defining the national myth, defining the essence of being Japanese, and defining the essence of the country. As we talk about respecting long religious traditions in Japan, I would posit that in fact those traditions are not very long in their history. Neither are they very traditional. In fact, they were often created or adopted by the government and manipulated to create a certain kind of national ethic. This enshrined the emperor as the symbol of the cult of national unity, which in turn became becomes an important variable.

The second important variable is the quest to enhance nationalism. The enshrinement of the glorious war was a way of generating a particular kind of patriotism, national unity, and national ethic. In fact, if you trace the growth of state Shinto and shrine Shinto, it actually begins most strongly in 1905 with the Russo-Japanese War and was further expressed in the Sino-Japanese War and then World War II. That enshrinement provides a very powerful impetus toward national unity.

Viewed from that perspective, Shintoism begins to occupy a space in the public sphere that necessarily begins to push out other religions that would find this kind of ideology antithetical to their beliefs. For example, Christians are generally required to participate in the imperial rites. Christian schools are required to have different kinds of shrines within the school and have a shrine representing the emperor. So you begin to see this kind of indoctrination.

In addition, you begin to see the development of political and legal doctrines that suggest non-participation is akin to treason, perhaps a violation of the peace preservation law. For the most part, Shinto does not really object to this incorporation because it enfranchises Shinto to a very strong degree. A provision in the Meiji constitution protects freedom of religion, but it is highly qualified: Religion is protected as long as it is not inconsistent with a whole range of other things.

Historical records suggest that freedom of religion was put in the constitution largely because people felt that foreign countries would demand that kind of provision before agreeing to revise the unequal treaties. In fact, there is a wonderful quotation by Ito Hirobumi, one of the of the constitution’s principal drafters. He says something like the following in his commentaries after the promulgation of the constitution: “Faith is a matter of heart, but law and order require that general constraints be placed on public expressions of one’s heart.” Then he gives a list of various necessary constraints—rituals, proselytizing, speaking in public, and organizing meetings. That doesn’t leave very much room, except for being a religious adherent in the privacy of your own home, as long as one does not speak about it, gather together, or in any way perform communal activities.

All people were required to participate in Shinto, and those who did not were subject to relatively severe penalties. Christian professors who refused to participate in the rites were dismissed from their positions. Steps were taken against religions that were thought to be somehow antithetical, such as the Omotokyo in 1935, which had its headquarters destroyed. Other religions were banned outright. Should any doubt remain that this is what the government intended, in 1940 it passed the Religious Organizations Law, which required all religions to register to be recognized. Only those religions that supported the teaching of the emperor’s divinity were recognized. In addition, in 1941 the Peace Preservation Law was amended to authorize the police to investigate and suppress religious groups that denied or opposed the national policy of emperor worship.

It is against this backdrop that the promulgation of the modern constitution of Japan and the occupation forces’ attempt to dismantle state Shinto take place. Charles Cates, one of the chiefs of the government section of the occupation, said, “we wanted to not only close the door on state Shintoism but also to throw away the key so it could not be opened.” The occupiers were very clear about that. They wanted to prevent religion from becoming a tool of nationalism. They took a series of steps to do that: They stopped state support of Shinto and made shrine Shinto simply another form of religion that needed to be registered under the Religious Organizations Law, as well as promulgating the two constitutional provisions that we have seen.

Interestingly, these provisions were not directly modeled on the U.S. Constitution but more on that of the Philippines. They actually have a very close linguistic connection to that constitution. Now this was effective in many ways. It inevitably discredited shrine Shinto in an important way and resulted in a dramatic expansion of religious organizations. At the moment there are 180,000 different religions registered under the Religious Organizations Law.

Let me conclude with a couple of thoughts about why I think this history is so relevant and why I worry a bit about current trends. The Japanese government has achieved an extraordinary degree of economic development and peace and prosperity. However, it continues to look for a set of legitimizing principles. Somehow democracy, liberalism, and capitalism do not seem sufficient as a unified ethic or national myth. One indication of this is the extent to which there has been a decades-long debate about what it means to be Japanese and what is unique about the Japanese—the famous Nihonjim Ron debate. Ethnicity alone does not seem to be adequate.

The government has made some clear attempts to again identify Japan with the myth of Shinto and the emperor to some extent. Legislation has been introduced in the Diet five times that would revive state support for at least some limited form of shrine Shinto, particularly the Yasukuni shrine, the Esai shrine, and so forth. In addition, as Prof. Kobayashi suggested, there are a large number of occasions on which local officials participate, by making financial contributions or in other ways, in local Shinto activities.

In light of that history, the courts, in my judgment, have not been overly vigorous in protecting the principle of freedom of religion. From that perspective—and trying to ensure that the state does not resume trying to manipulate religion in order to create a certain kind of national ethic and national unity—we have the ruling in the Ji-Chin Sai case that was talked about earlier. Certainly, one may look at the purpose and effects test and say that it was a purpose perhaps. It was a secular activity, and the effect did not particularly promote religion. But the ruling goes on to say it did not exceed the limits considered appropriate in the context of societal and cultural circumstances considering Japan’s history, in a way suggesting that this practice was traditional. It has been done in the past, so this is not such a bad thing.

It would seem to me, as an outsider looking at that past history, that, in fact, the Supreme Court should have said precisely because of Japan’s history and the prior extent to which the government manipulated those symbols, this sort of activity should be carefully guarded against.

I think the same is true about the Self-Defense Forces’ enshrinement case. In that case, again, the religious activities objectively followed common sense and did not seem to have a particular purpose. The court said that the Self-Defense Forces were merely engaged in a clerical task by providing names to the Shinto or the bereavement organization to be enshrined. The problems of that analysis are twofold. One is that the Self-Defense Forces were not providing those names to other religions, even though other religions had requested them. So you have, in fact, a problem of discrimination.

Second, you have a fairly severe problem in that it was precisely those kinds of clerical acts that enfranchised Shinto at the expense of other religions. It is also a problematic case, because it does not seem to recognize the fact that tolerance, if excessively applied, can itself become a doctrine of intolerance. That is to say, the widow’s right to exclusivity in her belief is something that the court does not credit at all. That itself, I think, has a long historical background.

I have a few thoughts on the Aum Sinrikyo incident and developments since then, but let me skip that and just conclude with these thoughts. One is that I do think Japan provides a very broad space for religion in the public square. Nevertheless, there are some worrisome signs. The courts are not enforcing the current protections with the kind of vigor that would be suggested as necessary in view of Japan’s history. Even the more recent Ehime case, which is a move in the right direction, nevertheless has doctrines built into it that seem to me to provide, in light of Japanese history, excessive flexibility. This is likely to be a particular problem in the coming years. As a number have suggested at this conference, an increasing number of people are interested in exploring the religious side of their lives, resulting in the growth in new religions. The need for adequate space for religions, which themselves will be at some level exclusive liturgies in their own way, is critical.