Payday loansPayday Loans

Recent News

  • Myanmar Politician Preparing to Seek Legal Limits on Interfaith, Interethnic Marriage

  • Call for Religious Leaders to Teach Acceptance in Malaysia

  • Attacks on religion, liberty

  • Can Muslim lands learn to tolerate Christianity?

  • China vents anger over Dalai Lama's planned Norway visit

  • Militia attack Muslims in Central African Republic's capital

  • Egypt’s new charter stronger on personal freedoms

  • Pussy Riot members freed from prison

  • Frank Wolf, champion of religious freedom, will end congressional career

  • A Political Deal in a Deeply Divided Tunisia as Islamists Agree to Yield Power

  • Egyptian Christians Bridle at Prison Terms for Copts Only in Fatal Clash

  • The Central African Republic descending into ‘complete chaos’

  • French burqa ban challenged in top European court

  • Sharia in Sudan v. women and religious freedom

  • China aims to harness religious beliefs to promote harmony

  • Afghanistan Considers Reinstating Public Stoning for Adultery

  • Sunnis Close Baghdad Mosques to Challenge Religious Attacks

  • Modi campaign stirs religious divide in India's heartland

  • Aung San Suu Kyi, and Myanmar, faces an uncertain future

  • Syrian Christians flee persecution as Patriarch urges them to stay in war-torn country

  • Central African Republic on the verge of genocide, France warns UN

  • Myanmar rejects U.N. resolution on Rohingya Muslims

  • How the State Department Is Getting Religion

  • UN to Myanmar: Make Rohingya Muslims citizens

  • Our Failed Religious Freedom Policy

  • Turkey drops a screen over Christianity

  • Opinion: The oppression of Bahais continues in Iran

  • TAJIKISTAN: "The Law demands that all religious literature be checked by the State"

  • Sudan’s Enduring Question: The Role of Shari'ah in the Constitution and Law

  • The Role of the Hijab Is Becoming a National Problem for Russia

  • For Indian Christian leader, Narendra Modi is a threat to religious freedom

  • Commentary: The two faces of India

  • With 'loving kindness', Myanmar frees 69 political prisoners

  • New U.N. Rights Council Members Are Elected

  • Turkish court lifts headscarf ban for attorneys

  • Egypt's Christians close ranks as kidnappings spike

  • Hundreds of Buddhists in Myanmar protest Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s upcoming visit

  • Frank Wolf Renews Calls for Release of U.S. Pastor from Iranian Prison

  • Many Sunnis and Shias Worry About Religious Conflict

  • China paper blames blind faith of “uncultured” Uighur youth for Xinjiang unrest

  • Turkey's Alevis protest for greater freedoms

  • KAZAKHSTAN: "He was told not to sell religious literature"

  • Myanmar violence between Buddhists, Muslims threatens reforms

  • UZBEKISTAN: Baptist camp ordered seized, Protestant pressured to inform

  • Tibetans Call China’s Policies at Tourist Spot Tacit but Stifling

  • Violence against Muslims threatening Myanmar reforms: U.N. envoy

  • Putin says unnamed foreign foes use radical Islam to weaken Russia

  • Malaysia’s curbs on use of the term ‘Allah’ hurting its moderate Muslim image

  • Vietnamese Court Orders Two Parishioners of Vinh Diocese Jailed

  • Opinion:State Department stays mute on persecuted religious minorities worldwide

  • Turkey, Religious Freedom and the Current State of Christian-Muslim Dialogue (1895)

  • In Nigeria, Wedlock Seen as Terror Fix

  • Northern Iraq no longer safe for Christians

  • Clerics call on UN military force to secure Central African Republic

  • EU condemns Egypt church violence, urges end to religion-based attacks

  • Young Turkish Jews emigrating due to anti-Semitism, tensions with Israel

  • Egypt orders trial of four policemen over killing of Islamist detainees

  • Passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

  • Egyptian writer may face jail for accusations of defaming religion

  • UN expert hails “key breakthrough for religious freedom reached in Cyprus”

  • Kenneth Bae's mother tells of heartbreak after seeing, leaving imprisoned son

  • Conviction of Christians for Murder of Hindu Leader in India Biased, Unfounded, Attorneys Say

  • Opera Fights Hungary’s Rising Anti-Semitism

  • Buddhists and Christians denounce Hanoi for using law to control religions

  • ARMENIA: "Imprisoned conscientious objectors should be immediately and unconditionally released"

  • Bombs planted in confessional box of Syrian church

  • French court upholds Scientology fraud conviction

  • Suzan Johnson Cook to resign as religious freedom ambassador

  • BELARUS: Why is Catholic priest still detained by KGB secret police?

  • Q&A: What Court Decision on Use of ‘Allah’ Means for Malaysia

  • The Surprising Story Of 'Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an'

  • Religious tension runs deep for Vietnam’s minorities

  • Malala Yousafzai wins EU's Sakharov human rights prize

  • Religious liberty takes center stage in diplomacy with Iran

  • Turban row: Sikh NGO wins case against France at UN

  • Vietnam Lets Churches Thrive, but Keeps Control

  • KAZAKHSTAN: Pastor to be transferred from prison to house arrest

  • Kenya Salvation Army Church Torched; Four Killed

  • Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng gets U.S. platform to promote human rights

  • Orthodox leader calls for end Christians' persecution

  • Jewish groups slam Council of Europe Assembly resolution on circumcision

  • Opinion: Quebec’s coup d’etat against religious freedom

  • Small town, big impact: Supreme Court case could define religion’s role in public

  • European council passes anti-ritual circumcision resolution

  • Council of Muftis complain to U.S. reps about disrespect for Muslims in Russia

  • Woman, 94, killed as Buddhist rioters attack Muslim villages in western Myanmar

  • RUSSIA: What's wrong with "extremist" Koran translation?

  • Persecution against Christians increases in many parts of the world

  • How Promotion of Religious Freedom Can Help Prevent Extreme Violence

  • RUSSIA: Muslims rush to challenge Koran "extremism" ruling

  • Judge Ordered Sikh to Remove 'That Rag' from Head, Says ACLU

  • Donate by Paypal or Credit Card

    Solution Graphics

    Click Amazon to Help ICRF

    amzn-ba100x70.gif (2357 bytes)

    Help ICRF with your donation

    Follow ICRF on Twitter

    Twitter Image

    Like Us on Facebook

    Facebook Image
    Prospects for Co-operation to Defend Religious Freedom PDF Print E-mail

    Leonard Swidler
    Journal for Ecumenical Studies

    delivered at the
    International Coalition for Religious Freedom Conference on 
    "Religious Freedom and the New Millenium"
    Berlin, Germany, May 29-31, 1998

    Those scholars who earlier in the twentieth century predicted the impending demise of Western civilization, I believe, were dead wrong. In 1922, after World War I, Oswald Spengler wrote his widely acclaimed book, The Decline of the West. In 1941, after the beginning of World War II, Pitirim Alexandrovich Soroken published his likewise popular book, The Crises of Our Age. Given the massive worldwide scale of the unprecedented destruction and horror of the world’s first global war (1914-18), and the even vastly greater destruction of the second global conflict (1939-45), the pessimistic predictions of these scholars and the great following that they found were understandable.

    In fact, however, those vast world conflagrations were manifestations, I believe, of the dark side of a unique breakthrough in the history of humankind. This breakthrough involved the modern development of Christendom, which has become Western civilization, and is now becoming global civilization. Never before had there been world wars. Likewise, never before had there been world political organizations. Never before did humanity possess the real possibility of destroying all human life, whether through nuclear or ecological catastrophe. Still, there are solid empirical grounds, I believe, for reasonable hope that the inherent life force of humankind will nevertheless prevail over the parallel death force.

    Some will recall that in the mid-1990s Professor Samuel Huntington of Harvard University named a central contemporary reality, when he argued that the fading cold war was being replaced by the rise of what he called a clash of civilizations. Fundamentalisms of all sorts—Christian, Muslim, Hindu, nationalist, ethnic, and tribal—are tearing at the fabric of the so-called new world order, even as it is being woven. Therefore, a world with clashing or potentially clashing cultures, religious and ethnic groups, and civilizations, is the world of the end of the second millennium.

    However, that is not all it is. Its very antithesis is, likewise, an increasing reality. Humanity is in the midst of a deep evolutionary shift toward a higher communal and dialogical way of life. This evolution of cultures and religion point toward a process that, I believe, is essential to healing the deep problems that inhere in all aspects of our human cultures, and at times even threaten our very survival, namely the awakening of human beings to the power of dialogue.

    I believe the future fundamentally offers two alternatives: death or dialogue. I do not believe this statement is an overdramatization. In the past, it was possible, indeed, unavoidable for most of us human beings to live out our lives in isolation from the vast majority of our fellows. We talked to our own cultural selves. That is, we spoke with those who thought like us, or who should think like us. Put briefly, until the edge of the present era we humans lived in the age of monologue. That age is now passing. We are now poised at the entrance to the age of dialogue.

    Deep dialogue is not simply a series of conversations. It is a whole new way of thinking. It is a way of seeing and reflecting on the world and its meaning. Deep dialogue is an encounter between two or more persons with differing views, the primary purpose of which is for each participant to learn from the other, so that she or he can change and grow. We enter into dialogue, when it is authentic dialogue primarily, so that we can learn, change, and grow, and not so that we can force change on the other.

    Why, we might ask, this dramatic change? Why should we pursue the truth by way of dialogue? Of course, we know there are many external reasons and factors that have appeared in the past two centuries which have contributed to the creation of what we call today a global village. However, there were also many fundamental intellectual changes as well.

    Thomas Kuhn revolutionized our understanding of the development of scientific thinking with his notion of paradigm shifts. He painstakingly showed that fundamental paradigms, or exemplary models, are the large thought frames within which we place and interpret all observed data. He also demonstrated that scientific advancement inevitably brings about eventual paradigm shifts. Examples are the shifts from geocentricism to heleocentrism or from Newtonian to Einsteinian physics. Such a paradigm shift, of course, is always vigorously resisted at first—as was the thought, for example, of Galileo—but the shift finally prevails.

    This insight of Kuhn’s, however, is not only valid for the development of thought in the natural sciences. It also applies to all major disciplines of human thought, including religious thought. Religion here being in my mind, and in any case, understood as an explanation of the ultimate meaning of life, and how to live according to that explanation. . . .

    I am very short on time, and I have a number of specifics on how this shift has taken place in the last two hundred years. So, I am going to try to give you a quick example of how we are coming to realize that all of our understanding of truth—our statements about reality—are no longer to be understood as absolute.

    The word absolute means unlimited, or absolvere in Latin. Imagine this book symbolizes human life, and all humans share this in common. It is as if we are all sitting around the globe in various places, cultures, religions, ethnic groups, etc. We all have our place in the world. We all share human life. Now, here I am. I can describe my place in the world. I am a male, Caucasian, American, Catholic, Christian, theologian, etc. etc. This is my place in the world. I experience human life. If I am careful, I can describe that human life experience accurately. Then, I would say that my statement is true. It accurately describes human life as I experience it. Over here is a 25 year old Chinese, Buddhist, woman, etc., etc. She, likewise, describes her place in the world. She also experiences human life. If she is careful in her description, her statement about her experiencing human life will be true. It will really describe human life as she experiences it. Her statement will be true. My statement will be true. They are both true, but they are not both the same. Each is limited. Each is de-absolutized, if you will.

    Now, the next point, a second axial period. It was Karl Jaspers who pointed out the significance of the huge paradigm shift, which occurred in the period from 800 to 200 BCE. He named that period the Axial Period, because the change was so radical that it affected all aspects of culture. It transformed consciousness itself. It was within the horizons of this form of consciousness that the great civilizations of Asia, the Middle East, and Europe developed. It was this form of consciousness that spread to other regions, through migration and exploration, thus becoming the dominant, though not exclusive, form of consciousness in the world. To this day we all bear the structure of consciousness that was shaped in this Axial Period, whether or not it came from China, India, the Middle East, or Europe, the major centers of consciousness back in that period.

    Prior to the Axial Period, the dominant form of consciousness was cosmic, tribal, mythic, and ritualistic. The consciousness of the tribal cultures was intimately connected with the cosmos and the fertility of human nature. The Axial period, on the other hand, moved from a consciousness that was connected with nature, to one that was analytical and abstract. Think, for example, of the development of philosophy in the area of Greece, and similar sorts of developments in India, the period of the Upanishads, and so on. Here you have a very different kind of consciousness.

    This was the shift, from the primal consciousness of one’s identity being in the collective, to the individual. Think, for example, of the shift represented by Gautama Buddha who mapped out a way of individual spiritual salvation, Nirvana. Think of the great Hebrew prophets who said, “I do not want sacrifice. I want you to live with a pure heart and walk in justice before your God.” The shift was also away from the external, or ritualistic in similar kind of fashion. So it was that the great world religions developed in this period.

    Let me say then that we have been moving through a series of paradigm shifts in all of human history. We experienced, at a global level, a major paradigm shift in this first axial period that radically changed much of the consciousness of the whole world, releasing huge amounts of energies. It has also had certain disadvantages as well. Certain things were forgotten, or suppressed. But, in any case, we now are moving into an age which a colleague of mine by the name of Edward Cousins points out is really a period of a paradigm shift of magnitude equal to that of the first axial period. Hence, he refers to our being in a second Axial period.

    Just as the earlier shift was from a collective to an individual consciousness, our consciousness is now becoming global. Our very conference here is an indication of that. We turn on the television, and the whole world comes into our living rooms. Our whole life is becoming one of global consciousness. There is another characteristic of globalization in this contemporary second axial period: we are becoming vertically global. We are rediscovering our roots in this earth. The whole ecological movement is one which is now attempting to recover that connectedness with nature, much of which was lost from the primal consciousness, but is now being brought together with the analytic understanding that we have developed in the meanwhile.

    I would add that the forces of history, up until very recently, have been forces of divergence. Now we are entering a situation of convergence. The very shape of the globe indicated that, eventually, with the population explosion, we would move in the direction of convergence. However, this is not only physical, not only economic, and other ways externally. It is also a convergence of consciousness. This is why dialogue is not only a possibility, but an absolute necessity. If we do not engage in serious dialogue, we are going to find ourselves, as I suggested before, in a situation where we will destroy ourselves, spiritually and physically.

    It seems to me that what we must do is focus on developing a way of entering into dialogue with those who differ from us. Please realize, however, that the word dialogue, which has become very popular these days, does not mean simply having a conversation with somebody who is different from us, whereby we listen to the other person to be polite, and then try to persuade him of our position. This is not dialogue at all. This is just the old debate version in a soft sell approach. The result will be precisely the same, namely, defensiveness on the part of our partner, who will not really be listening to us because she or he will perceive that we are trying to put him or her in our pocket. However, if we come to the conversation primarily to learn; if now I say to my Chinese Buddhist friend, “Tell me about your perception of life, so that I can learn something about it that I cannot learn from my perspective I need to be in dialogue with you, so I can learn more about reality, and you with me,” then we can in fact develop a kind of world which will become more fully human.