Payday loansPayday Loans

Recent News

  • Myanmar Politician Preparing to Seek Legal Limits on Interfaith, Interethnic Marriage

  • Call for Religious Leaders to Teach Acceptance in Malaysia

  • Attacks on religion, liberty

  • Can Muslim lands learn to tolerate Christianity?

  • China vents anger over Dalai Lama's planned Norway visit

  • Militia attack Muslims in Central African Republic's capital

  • Egypt’s new charter stronger on personal freedoms

  • Pussy Riot members freed from prison

  • Frank Wolf, champion of religious freedom, will end congressional career

  • A Political Deal in a Deeply Divided Tunisia as Islamists Agree to Yield Power

  • Egyptian Christians Bridle at Prison Terms for Copts Only in Fatal Clash

  • The Central African Republic descending into ‘complete chaos’

  • French burqa ban challenged in top European court

  • Sharia in Sudan v. women and religious freedom

  • China aims to harness religious beliefs to promote harmony

  • Afghanistan Considers Reinstating Public Stoning for Adultery

  • Sunnis Close Baghdad Mosques to Challenge Religious Attacks

  • Modi campaign stirs religious divide in India's heartland

  • Aung San Suu Kyi, and Myanmar, faces an uncertain future

  • Syrian Christians flee persecution as Patriarch urges them to stay in war-torn country

  • Central African Republic on the verge of genocide, France warns UN

  • Myanmar rejects U.N. resolution on Rohingya Muslims

  • How the State Department Is Getting Religion

  • UN to Myanmar: Make Rohingya Muslims citizens

  • Our Failed Religious Freedom Policy

  • Turkey drops a screen over Christianity

  • Opinion: The oppression of Bahais continues in Iran

  • TAJIKISTAN: "The Law demands that all religious literature be checked by the State"

  • Sudan’s Enduring Question: The Role of Shari'ah in the Constitution and Law

  • The Role of the Hijab Is Becoming a National Problem for Russia

  • For Indian Christian leader, Narendra Modi is a threat to religious freedom

  • Commentary: The two faces of India

  • With 'loving kindness', Myanmar frees 69 political prisoners

  • New U.N. Rights Council Members Are Elected

  • Turkish court lifts headscarf ban for attorneys

  • Egypt's Christians close ranks as kidnappings spike

  • Hundreds of Buddhists in Myanmar protest Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s upcoming visit

  • Frank Wolf Renews Calls for Release of U.S. Pastor from Iranian Prison

  • Many Sunnis and Shias Worry About Religious Conflict

  • China paper blames blind faith of “uncultured” Uighur youth for Xinjiang unrest

  • Turkey's Alevis protest for greater freedoms

  • KAZAKHSTAN: "He was told not to sell religious literature"

  • Myanmar violence between Buddhists, Muslims threatens reforms

  • UZBEKISTAN: Baptist camp ordered seized, Protestant pressured to inform

  • Tibetans Call China’s Policies at Tourist Spot Tacit but Stifling

  • Violence against Muslims threatening Myanmar reforms: U.N. envoy

  • Putin says unnamed foreign foes use radical Islam to weaken Russia

  • Malaysia’s curbs on use of the term ‘Allah’ hurting its moderate Muslim image

  • Vietnamese Court Orders Two Parishioners of Vinh Diocese Jailed

  • Opinion:State Department stays mute on persecuted religious minorities worldwide

  • Turkey, Religious Freedom and the Current State of Christian-Muslim Dialogue (1895)

  • In Nigeria, Wedlock Seen as Terror Fix

  • Northern Iraq no longer safe for Christians

  • Clerics call on UN military force to secure Central African Republic

  • EU condemns Egypt church violence, urges end to religion-based attacks

  • Young Turkish Jews emigrating due to anti-Semitism, tensions with Israel

  • Egypt orders trial of four policemen over killing of Islamist detainees

  • Passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

  • Egyptian writer may face jail for accusations of defaming religion

  • UN expert hails “key breakthrough for religious freedom reached in Cyprus”

  • Kenneth Bae's mother tells of heartbreak after seeing, leaving imprisoned son

  • Conviction of Christians for Murder of Hindu Leader in India Biased, Unfounded, Attorneys Say

  • Opera Fights Hungary’s Rising Anti-Semitism

  • Buddhists and Christians denounce Hanoi for using law to control religions

  • ARMENIA: "Imprisoned conscientious objectors should be immediately and unconditionally released"

  • Bombs planted in confessional box of Syrian church

  • French court upholds Scientology fraud conviction

  • Suzan Johnson Cook to resign as religious freedom ambassador

  • BELARUS: Why is Catholic priest still detained by KGB secret police?

  • Q&A: What Court Decision on Use of ‘Allah’ Means for Malaysia

  • The Surprising Story Of 'Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an'

  • Religious tension runs deep for Vietnam’s minorities

  • Malala Yousafzai wins EU's Sakharov human rights prize

  • Religious liberty takes center stage in diplomacy with Iran

  • Turban row: Sikh NGO wins case against France at UN

  • Vietnam Lets Churches Thrive, but Keeps Control

  • KAZAKHSTAN: Pastor to be transferred from prison to house arrest

  • Kenya Salvation Army Church Torched; Four Killed

  • Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng gets U.S. platform to promote human rights

  • Orthodox leader calls for end Christians' persecution

  • Jewish groups slam Council of Europe Assembly resolution on circumcision

  • Opinion: Quebec’s coup d’etat against religious freedom

  • Small town, big impact: Supreme Court case could define religion’s role in public

  • European council passes anti-ritual circumcision resolution

  • Council of Muftis complain to U.S. reps about disrespect for Muslims in Russia

  • Woman, 94, killed as Buddhist rioters attack Muslim villages in western Myanmar

  • RUSSIA: What's wrong with "extremist" Koran translation?

  • Persecution against Christians increases in many parts of the world

  • How Promotion of Religious Freedom Can Help Prevent Extreme Violence

  • RUSSIA: Muslims rush to challenge Koran "extremism" ruling

  • Judge Ordered Sikh to Remove 'That Rag' from Head, Says ACLU

  • Donate by Paypal or Credit Card

    Solution Graphics

    Click Amazon to Help ICRF

    amzn-ba100x70.gif (2357 bytes)

    Help ICRF with your donation

    Follow ICRF on Twitter

    Twitter Image

    Like Us on Facebook

    Facebook Image
    Religious Wars and World Peace PDF Print E-mail

    Frank Kaufmann
    Inter-Religious Federation for World Peace

    delivered at the
    International Coalition for Religious Freedom Conference on 
    "Religious Freedom and the New Millenium"
    Washington DC, April 17-19, 1998

    Religious freedom and religious peace are distinct matters, and that distinction is part of what I intend to elaborate on. I hope to establish clear links between the two concepts.

    Both religious conflict and religious persecution basically make life as a religious believer contrary to the way it should be. War unsettles your life and someone persecuting you unsettles your life. But they do so for different reasons. The question of religious freedom pertains to your condition as a religious believer within a single dimension or sphere of sovereignty. In other words, you are a member of a state, and your freedoms are jeopardized by an organization or state that has sovereignty over you.

    Religious wars, on the other hand, are an engagement across the boundaries of sovereignty. Religious freedom is a modern concept that is derived from emerging concepts of secular governance. The idea of human rights and religious freedom is a modern and borderline “nonreligious” notion. Religious wars, I would contend, are a pre-modern phenomenon. Most religions do not have the instruments of war at their disposal. Probably Muslim countries are the exception. The Vatican happens to be a state, but they don’t have the divisions. Their divisions appear to be down to a minimum.

    With that distinction made, I would say that this conference is characterized by a certain ambiguity. For example, on our opening evening Joseph Paige elaborated on some very good principles, guidelines, impulses, and attitudes required for religious dialogue. That was well instructed—what you can’t digest, leave on the plate. He also shared many other principles that can guide our way to coming closer through dialogue.

    On the other hand, immediately following Dr. Page’s remarks, Dr. Littell gave a very stirring and haunting image of the slide beginning with tolerance moving all the way to genocide. That is a religious issue. Also, this morning Dr. Swidler gave remarks analyzing the actual ages, which he concluded by introducing his own Institute for Global Dialogue. It is essentially an interfaith undertaking. It is an organization designed for dialogue and to enhance and create understanding between religions.

    Dr. Arias, on the other hand, spoke on the realm of rights. He even ultimately called for a declaration of universal obligations. Those are fascinating and encouraging ideas, but you see very clearly how these two issues, until now, were not clearly reflected upon. Several speakers gave a global overview of religious freedom. Many of the African situations are issues of religious conflict. In other words, they are nations divided between two religious communities that are in conflict. These are not technically matters of religious freedom. They are just two groups of people. In the case of Sudan, for instance, a Muslim north and a Christian south are in conflict with one another.

    What we find in the modern age is religious conflict. If you are talking about religious wars, you find that the term is no longer used after 1715 or so. You will find lots of journal articles or books describing the period of religious wars, the Protestant wars, and so forth before that time. However, in the modern period, we don’t talk about religions. We talk about religious conflict. The reason we have religious conflict is that these are sub-sovereignties. There is loyalty to a unit different than the state. This causes conflict, and some sort of warfare may result. You can have a lot of weaponry and guns and act like a soldier, but usually it is a terrorist war, because it is not between states.

    The relationship between religion and state is ripe for misuse on both sides—both political and religious concerns. The political concerns mostly want a state that is stable. Politics is, to a certain degree, a matter of maintaining order, of exerting authority.

    The ideal pursuit of the state is peace and prosperity. Religions, on the other hand, are mostly concerned with ideology. Religions also, within themselves, like to have uniformity. They set tolerable perimeters for behavior in the community. Then you start to have excommunications, heresies, and so forth. The two communities operate similarly, but with different obsessions over where their bottom line is, what they are after.

    They are not separable in human affairs, however. All states are going to have some ideological underpinning for executing or implementing their policies, and all religions are going to have some form of relationship with the state. There may either be a wedding, by which they can share in the authority and dominance of the subjects of the state, or there will be a minority community subject to the will of the majority.

    Over time, it has come to the consciousness of states, particularly in the modern period, that a degree of cooperation benefits your own self-interest. Wars have shifted, in large part, when we are talking about very high-level countries, like the G-7 powers. Their wars are economic, not military. So given the recognition of the shift in forms of dominance, expansion, or imperialism, nations do not really need to fight over a river or a port to the same degree that wars were waged earlier.

    The market reveals an insight that cooperation is a benefit. As a result, in the modern period there has been the recognition and awareness that self-interest can be benefited through cooperation. For this reason the nature of the world is such that things like the United Nations are a very popular concept. Most people who are extremely fond of it don’t know that much about it but still like it because it is a pleasant thought—all nations cooperating. If you ever get in there you will find there is a real schizophrenic community of people who are theoretically for one world and operate on nothing other than simple self-interest. That is a bit critical, but it is often characteristic of the dynamics that operate at the United Nations.

    Now, while material affairs—political and economic affairs—have emerged in the modern period as having growing awareness that cooperation is a benefit, and that, as the expression goes, “all ships rise when the tide comes in,” religions actually have never emerged into that state of consciousness. In fact, the spiritual or religious coin of the realm is such that it would be difficult to forge or determine what is the common benefit of cooperation in religion.

    The ideal for cooperation is always democracy. But there has never emerged a religious ideal. Democracy is at best a stretch into the post-Protestant trend in religion, where the human conscience is the distinct link between the individual and God, and then you kind of shed religion and produce a system of government. It is called democracy, in which there is tolerance and individual freedom.

    I am very interested to hear of Justice Thomas’s attachment to natural law, because there is an effort to develop a more universal, nonspecific religious foundation to democracy. But, until this point, religion does not avail itself of democracy. And religion has not yet identified ways in which it, as an aspect of human endeavor, will be enhanced and will improve on the basis of democratic principles and cooperation. I would argue that there are, in fact, a great many benefits to authentic religious cooperation in ways that would imitate democratic ideals either as a community of nations or as a democracy in a given country.

    The other thing that is lacking in the religious world in order for it to inherit or catch up to the contemporary impulse toward peace and human cooperation is an independent body that oversees religious affairs and is critical of those that are contrary to the community of religions. The United Nations functions in this way for nations. When nations get out of hand, the rest of the nations get together, expose the behavior of the nation acting irresponsibly, and attempt to generate international censure or ways of pressuring the rogue state.

    Religious affairs are conducted in the dark. They are not in the open. So far, there is no international body that even symbolically sits above religions at an international or interreligious level that would in similar fashion bring religious affairs to the light of day. This organization would have the community of religions operate in such a way that they would want to expose, bring censure, and put pressure on religions that are acting contrary to the cooperative nature of the body.

    But this organization must be forged out of the world of religions itself. It can’t be forged out of the United Nations. It can’t be forged out of some community based on democracy because democracy is not generated out of purely religious concerns. The United Nations, until very recently, has actually been hostile to religion. It doesn’t understand religion very well. Now it is coming around, and I am happy to see developments there.

    I hope I haven’t abbreviated my remarks to the degree that I have interfered with your ability to follow my line. My position is that religions have never entered into the modern period. Religious wars once took place when religion and state were fused. When religion became separated from state, then the possibility of democracy, human rights, and human freedoms was established based on a principle of political governance not derived necessarily from a religious position.

    That means that religions did not follow the political order. Therefore, although we see a world moving toward peace, economic and political cooperation, and the conscience of the world in institutions like the United Nations, we find a very shadowy relationship between religion and politics. This is because religion has not yet had the opportunity and the structures of international organizations that can begin to function and elevate it into “democratic” principles.

    What I would like to see emerge in the modern period is a way for religions to shed their pre-modern impulses and come to understand that there are tremendous benefits from a democratic form of cooperation with one another. Religions no longer need to operate in the dark and not be accountable for their behavior internationally. But the only community, or the only group of people, able to spawn such an organization will be a community of religious leaders. It will not be derived from the secular realm.